Generic parser library capable of providing partial results from partial input.
|Version on this page:||0.3.2|
|LTS Haskell 17.12:||0.5.0.2|
|Stackage Nightly 2021-05-16:||0.5.0.2|
|Latest on Hackage:||0.5.0.2|
Module documentation for 0.3.2
The incremental-parser library is yet another parser combinator library, providing the usual set of
Monad combinators. Apart from this, it has three twists that make it unique.
First, the parser is incremental. Not only can it be fed its input in chunks, but in proper circumstances it can also
provide its output in parsed chunks. For this to be possible the result type must be a
Monoid. The complete parsing
result is then a concatenation of the partial results.
In order to make the incremental parsing easier, the combinator set is optimized for monoidal results. Apart from the
some, for example, there are
many :: Parser s r -> Parser s [r] concatMany :: (Monoid s, Monoid r) => Parser s r -> Parser s r
Arbitrary monoidal inputs
The second weirdness, this one shared with Picoparsec, is that the the parser is generic in its input stream type, but this type is parameterized in a holistic way. There is no separate token type. Primitive parsers that need to peek into the input require its type to be an instance of a monoid subclass, from the monoid-subclasses package.
string :: Stream s m Char => String -> ParsecT s u m String char :: Stream s m Char => Char -> ParsecT s u m Char anyToken :: (Stream s m t, Show t) => ParsecT s u m t
string :: ByteString -> Parser ByteString word8 :: Word8 -> Parser Word8 anyWord8 :: Parser Word8
In incremental-parser and Picoparsec:
string :: (LeftCancellativeMonoid s, MonoidNull s) => s -> Parser s s token :: (Eq s, FactorialMonoid s) => s -> Parser s s anyToken :: FactorialMonoid s => Parser s s
Finally, the library being implemented on the basis of Brzozowski derivatives, it can provide both the symmetric and the
<<|>. This is the same design choice made by
uu-parsinglib. Parsec and its progeny on the other hand provide only
the faster left-biased choice, at some cost to the expressiveness of the combinator language. The standard
operator from the
Alternative class acts as one or the other of the above, depending on whether the first type