replace-megaparsec
Find, replace, and split string patterns with Megaparsec parsers (instead of regex)
https://github.com/jamesdbrock/replace-megaparsec
Version on this page: | 1.4.5.0 |
LTS Haskell 22.39: | 1.5.0.1 |
Stackage Nightly 2024-11-02: | 1.5.0.1 |
Latest on Hackage: | 1.5.0.1 |
replace-megaparsec-1.4.5.0@sha256:864f0e06170ba7d697ff380be551af4006397236a8cd3bfd35cdb8160ce4c80f,2462
Module documentation for 1.4.5.0
- Replace
- Replace.Megaparsec
- Replace.Megaparsec.Internal
- Replace.Megaparsec
replace-megaparsec
replace-megaparsec is for finding text patterns, and also replacing or splitting on the found patterns. This activity is traditionally done with regular expressions, but replace-megaparsec uses megaparsec parsers instead for the pattern matching.
replace-megaparsec can be used in the same sort of “pattern capture”
or “find all” situations in which one would use Python
re.findall
or
Perl m//
,
or
Unix grep
.
replace-megaparsec can be used in the same sort of “stream editing”
or “search-and-replace” situations in which one would use Python
re.sub
,
or
Perl s///
,
or Unix
sed
,
or
awk
.
replace-megaparsec can be used in the same sort of “string splitting”
situations in which one would use Python
re.split
or Perl
split
.
See replace-attoparsec for the attoparsec version.
Why would we want to do pattern matching and substitution with parsers instead of regular expressions?
-
Haskell parsers have a nicer syntax than regular expressions, which are notoriously difficult to read.
-
Regular expressions can do “group capture” on sections of the matched pattern, but they can only return stringy lists of the capture groups. Parsers can construct typed data structures based on the capture groups, guaranteeing no disagreement between the pattern rules and the rules that we’re using to build data structures based on the pattern matches.
For example, consider scanning a string for numbers. A lot of different things can look like a number, and can have leading plus or minus signs, or be in scientific notation, or have commas, or whatever. If we try to parse all of the numbers out of a string using regular expressions, then we have to make sure that the regular expression and the string-to-number conversion function agree about exactly what is and what isn’t a numeric string. We can get into an awkward situation in which the regular expression says it has found a numeric string but the string-to-number conversion function fails. A typed parser will perform both the pattern match and the conversion, so it will never be in that situation. Parse, don’t validate.
-
Regular expressions are only able to pattern-match regular grammars. Megaparsec parsers are able pattern-match context-free grammars, and even context-sensitive grammars, if needed. See below for an example of lifting a
Parser
into aState
monad for context-sensitive pattern-matching. -
The replacement expression for a traditional regular expression-based substitution command is usually just a string template in which the Nth “capture group” can be inserted with the syntax
\N
. With this library, instead of a template, we get aneditor
function which can perform any computation, including IO.
Usage Examples
These usage examples can be run in a live Jupyter notebook hosted by mybinder.org. Click the badge to launch:
Try the examples in ghci
by
running cabal v2-repl
in the replace-megaparsec/
root directory.
The examples depend on these imports.
import Data.Void
import Replace.Megaparsec
import Text.Megaparsec
import Text.Megaparsec.Char
import Text.Megaparsec.Char.Lexer
Split strings with splitCap
Find all pattern matches, capture the matched text and the parsed result
Separate the input string into sections which can be parsed as a hexadecimal
number with a prefix "0x"
, and sections which can’t. Parse the numbers.
let hexparser = chunk "0x" *> hexadecimal :: Parsec Void String Integer
splitCap (match hexparser) "0xA 000 0xFFFF"
[Right ("0xA",10), Left " 000 ", Right ("0xFFFF",65535)]
Find all pattern matches, capture only the locations of the matched patterns
Find all of the sections of the stream which are letters. Capture a list of the offsets of the beginning of every pattern match.
import Data.Either
let letterOffset = getOffset <* some letterChar :: Parsec Void String Int
rights $ splitCap letterOffset " a bc "
[1,4]
Pattern match balanced parentheses
Find groups of balanced nested parentheses. This is an example of a “context-free” grammar, a pattern that can’t be expressed by a regular expression. We can express the pattern with a recursive parser.
import Data.Functor (void)
import Data.Bifunctor (second)
let parens :: Parsec Void String ()
parens = do
char '('
manyTill
(void (noneOf "()") <|> void parens)
(char ')')
pure ()
second fst <$> splitCap (match parens) "(()) (()())"
[Right "(())",Left " ",Right "(()())"]
Edit strings with streamEdit
The following examples show how to search for a pattern in a string of text and then edit the string of text to substitute in some replacement text for the matched patterns.
Pattern match and replace with a constant
Replace all carriage-return-newline occurances with newline.
let crnl = chunk "\r\n" :: Parsec Void String String
streamEdit crnl (const "\n") "1\r\n2\r\n"
"1\n2\n"
Pattern match and edit the matches
Replace alphabetic characters with the next character in the alphabet.
let somelet = some letterChar :: Parsec Void String String
streamEdit somelet (fmap succ) "HAL 9000"
"IBM 9000"
Pattern match and maybe edit the matches, or maybe leave them alone
Find all of the string sections s
which can be parsed as a
hexadecimal number r
,
and if r≤16
, then replace s
with a decimal number. Uses the
match
combinator.
let hexparser = chunk "0x" *> hexadecimal :: Parsec Void String Integer
streamEdit (match hexparser) (\(s,r) -> if r<=16 then show r else s) "0xA 000 0xFFFF"
"10 000 0xFFFF"
Pattern match and edit the matches with IO with streamEditT
Find an environment variable in curly braces and replace it with its value from the environment.
import System.Environment (getEnv)
let bracevar = char '{' *> manyTill anySingle (char '}') :: ParsecT Void String IO String
streamEditT bracevar getEnv "- {HOME} -"
"- /home/jbrock -"
Context-sensitive pattern match and edit the matches with streamEditT
Capitalize the third letter in a string. The capThird
parser searches for
individual letters, and it needs to remember how many times it has run so
that it can match successfully only on the third time that it finds a letter.
To enable the parser to remember how many times it has run, we’ll
compose the parser with a State
monad from
the mtl
package. (Run in ghci
with cabal v2-repl -b mtl
). Because it has
stateful memory, this parser is an example of a “context-sensitive” grammar.
import qualified Control.Monad.State.Strict as MTL
import Control.Monad.State.Strict (get, put, evalState)
import Data.Char (toUpper)
let capThird :: ParsecT Void String (MTL.State Int) String
capThird = do
x <- letterChar
i <- get
let i' = i+1
put i'
if i'==3 then pure [x] else empty
flip evalState 0 $ streamEditT capThird (pure . fmap toUpper) "a a a a a"
"a a A a a"
Pattern match, edit the matches, and count the edits with streamEditT
Find and capitalize no more than three letters in a string, and return the
edited string along with the number of letters capitalized. To enable the
editor function to remember how many letters it has capitalized, we’ll
run streamEditT
in the State
monad from the mtl
package. Use this
technique to get the same functionality as Python
re.subn
.
import qualified Control.Monad.State.Strict as MTL
import Control.Monad.State.Strict (get, put, runState)
import Data.Char (toUpper)
let editThree :: Char -> MTL.State Int String
editThree x = do
i <- get
if i<3
then do
put $ i+1
pure [toUpper x]
else pure [x]
flip runState 0 $ streamEditT letterChar editThree "a a a a a"
("A A A a a",3)
Non-greedy pattern repetition
This is not a feature of this library, but it’s a useful technique to know.
How do we do non-greedy repetition of a pattern p
, like we would in Regex
by writing p*?
?
By using the
manyTill_
combinator. To repeat pattern p
non-greedily, write
manyTill_ p q
where q
is the entire rest of the parser.
For example, this parse fails because many
repeats the pattern letterChar
greedily.
flip parseMaybe "aab" $ do
a <- many letterChar
b <- single 'b'
pure (a,b)
Nothing
To repeat pattern letterChar
non-greedily, use manyTill_
.
flip parseMaybe "aab" $ do
(a,b) <- manyTill_ letterChar $ do
single 'b'
pure (a,b)
Just ("aa",'b')
In the Shell
If we’re going to have a viable sed
replacement then we want to be able
to use it easily from the command line. This
Stack script interpreter
script will find decimal numbers in a stream and replace them with their double.
#!/usr/bin/env stack
{- stack
script
--resolver lts-16
--package megaparsec
--package replace-megaparsec
-}
-- https://docs.haskellstack.org/en/stable/GUIDE/#script-interpreter
import Data.Void
import Text.Megaparsec
import Text.Megaparsec.Char
import Text.Megaparsec.Char.Lexer
import Replace.Megaparsec
main = interact $ streamEdit (decimal :: Parsec Void String Int) (show . (*2))
If you have
The Haskell Tool Stack
installed then you can just copy-paste this into a file named doubler.hs
and
run it. (On the first run Stack may need to download the dependencies.)
$ chmod u+x doubler.hs
$ echo "1 6 21 107" | ./doubler.hs
2 12 42 214
Alternatives
Some libraries that one might consider instead of this one.
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/regex-applicative
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pcre-heavy
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/lens-regex-pcre
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/regex
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pipes-parse
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/stringsearch
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/substring-parser
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pcre-utils
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/template
Benchmarks
These benchmarks are intended to measure the wall-clock speed of everything except the actual pattern-matching. Speed of the pattern-matching is the responsibility of the megaparsec and attoparsec libraries.
The benchmark task is to find all of the one-character patterns x
in a
text stream and replace them by a function which returns the constant
string oo
. So, like the regex s/x/oo/g
.
We have two benchmark input cases, which we call dense and sparse.
The dense case is one megabyte of alternating spaces and x
s
like
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The sparse case is one megabyte of spaces with a single x
in the middle
like
x
Each benchmark program reads the input from stdin
, replaces x
with oo
,
and writes the result to stdout
. The time elapsed is measured by perf stat
,
and the best observed time is recorded.
See replace-benchmark for details.
Program | dense | sparse |
---|---|---|
Python 3.7.4 re.sub repl function |
89.23ms | 23.98ms |
Perl 5 s///ge |
180.65ms | 5.02ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit String |
441.94ms | 375.04ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit ByteString |
529.99ms | 73.76ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit Text |
547.47ms | 139.21ms |
Replace.Attoparsec.ByteString.streamEdit |
394.12ms | 41.13ms |
Replace.Attoparsec.Text.streamEdit |
515.26ms | 46.10ms |
Text.Regex.Applicative.replace String |
1083.98ms | 646.40ms |
Text.Regex.PCRE.Heavy.gsub Text |
> 10min | 14.29ms |
Control.Lens.Regex.ByteString.match |
> 10min | 4.27ms |
Control.Lens.Regex.Text.match |
> 10min | 14.74ms |
Hypothetically Asked Questions
-
Could we write this library for parsec?
No, because the
match
combinator doesn’t exist for parsec. (I can’t find it anywhere. Can it be written?) -
Is this a good idea?
You may have heard it suggested that monadic parsers are better for pattern-matching when the input stream is mostly signal, and regular expressions are better when the input stream is mostly noise.
The premise of this library is that monadic parsers are great for finding small signal patterns in a stream of otherwise noisy text.
Our reluctance to forego the speedup opportunities afforded by restricting ourselves to regular grammars is an old superstition about opportunities which remain mostly unexploited anyway. The performance compromise of allowing stack memory allocation (a.k.a. pushdown automata, a.k.a. context-free grammar) was once considered controversial for general-purpose programming languages. I think we can now resolve that controversy the same way for pattern matching languages.
Changes
Revision history for replace-megaparsec
1.4.5.0 – 2022-04-14
Minor documentation changes.
Confirmed tests pass for text v2.
1.4.4.0 – 2020-12-04
Add splitCapT
and breakCapT
.
1.4.3.0 – 2020-09-28
Bugfix sepCap backtracking when sep fails
See #33
1.4.1.0 – 2020-05-07
anyTill use getInput instead of takeRest
1.4.0.0 – 2020-05-06
Running Parsers: Add splitCap
and breakCap
.
Parser Combinators: Add anyTill
.
Remove Show
and Typeable
constraints on streamEditT
.
1.3.0.0 – 2020-03-06
sepCap
won’t throw.
Don’t throw an exception on an unreachable error case, just bottom.
Remove type constraints for Exception
.
1.2.1.0 – 2020-01-01
Allow any error parameter, not just Void
.
1.2.0.0 – 2019-10-31
Benchmark improvements
Specializations of the sepCap
function, guided by
replace-benchmark.
New benchmarks
Program | dense | sparse |
---|---|---|
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit String |
454.95ms | 375.04ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit ByteString |
529.99ms | 73.76ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit Text |
547.47ms | 139.21ms |
Old benchmarks
Program | dense | sparse |
---|---|---|
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit String |
454.95ms | 375.04ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit ByteString |
611.98ms | 433.26ms |
Replace.Megaparsec.streamEdit Text |
592.66ms | 353.32ms |
1.1.5.0 – 2019-10-08
- Move benchmarks to replace-benchmark
1.1.0.0 – 2019-09-01
- Add benchmark suite.
- In
streamEditT
, replacefold
withmconcat
. The benchmarks now show linear scaling instead of quadratic.
1.0.1.0 – 2019-08-28
- Add test suite.
sepCap
will treatssep
as failing if it succeeds but consumes no input.
1.0.0.0 – 2019-08-24
- First version.