In Haskell 98 the name of a record field is automatically also the name of a function which gets the value of the according field. E.g. if we have
data Pair a b = Pair first :: a, second :: b
first :: Pair a b -> a second :: Pair a b -> b
However for setting or modifying a field value we need to use some syntactic sugar, which is often clumsy.
modifyFirst :: (a -> a) -> (Pair a b -> Pair a b) modifyFirst f r@(Pair first=a ) = r first = f a
With this package you can define record field accessors which allow setting, getting and modifying values easily. The package clearly demonstrates the power of the functional approach: You can combine accessors of a record and sub-records, to make the access look like the fields of the sub-record belong to the main record.
*Data.Accessor.Example> (first^:second^=10) (('b',7),"hallo") (('b',10),"hallo")
You can easily manipulate record fields in a
you can easily code
Show instances that use the Accessor syntax
and you can parse binary streams into records.
Data.Accessor.Example for demonstration of all features.
It would be great if in revised Haskell versions the names of record fields
rather than plain
For now, the package
data-accessor-template provides Template Haskell functions
for automated generation of
See also the other
that provide an Accessor interface to other data types.
enumset provides accessors to bit-packed records.
For similar packages see
A related concept are editors
Editors only consist of a modify method
modify applied to a
const function is a
This way, they can modify all function values of a function at once,
whereas an accessor can only change a single function value,
say, it can change
f 0 = 1 to
f 0 = 2.
This way, editors can even change the type of a record or a function.
An Arrow instance can be defined for editors,
but for accessors only a Category instance is possible ('(.)' method).
The reason is the
arr method of the
that conflicts with the two-way nature (set and get) of accessors.