Hoogle Search

Within LTS Haskell 24.4 (ghc-9.10.2)

Note that Stackage only displays results for the latest LTS and Nightly snapshot. Learn more.

  1. foldl :: forall b a (n :: Nat) . (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Vec n a -> b

    clash-prelude Clash.Prelude.Safe

    foldl, applied to a binary operator, a starting value (typically the left-identity of the operator), and a vector, reduces the vector using the binary operator, from left to right:

    foldl f z (x1 :> x2 :> ... :> xn :> Nil) == (...((z `f` x1) `f` x2) `f`...) `f` xn
    foldl f z Nil                            == z
    
    >>> foldl (/) 1 (5 :> 4 :> 3 :> 2 :> Nil)
    8.333333333333333e-3
    
    "foldl f z xs" corresponds to the following circuit layout: NB: "foldl f z xs" produces a linear structure, which has a depth, or delay, of O(length xs). Use fold if your binary operator f is associative, as "fold f xs" produces a structure with a depth of O(log_2(length xs)).

  2. foldl :: forall b a (n :: Nat) . (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Vec n a -> b

    clash-prelude Clash.Sized.Vector

    foldl, applied to a binary operator, a starting value (typically the left-identity of the operator), and a vector, reduces the vector using the binary operator, from left to right:

    foldl f z (x1 :> x2 :> ... :> xn :> Nil) == (...((z `f` x1) `f` x2) `f`...) `f` xn
    foldl f z Nil                            == z
    
    >>> foldl (/) 1 (5 :> 4 :> 3 :> 2 :> Nil)
    8.333333333333333e-3
    
    "foldl f z xs" corresponds to the following circuit layout: NB: "foldl f z xs" produces a linear structure, which has a depth, or delay, of O(length xs). Use fold if your binary operator f is associative, as "fold f xs" produces a structure with a depth of O(log_2(length xs)).

  3. foldl :: (C sh, Storable a) => (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Array sh a -> b

    comfort-blas Numeric.BLAS.Vector

    No documentation available.

  4. foldl :: forall b a o u (m :: Type -> Type) . (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Pipe a o u m b

    conduino Data.Conduino.Combinators

    Left-fold every input into an accumulated value. Essentially this maintains a state and modifies that state with every input, using the given accumulating function.

  5. foldl :: Foldable t => (b -> a -> b) -> b -> t a -> b

    dimensional Numeric.Units.Dimensional.Prelude

    Left-associative fold of a structure, lazy in the accumulator. This is rarely what you want, but can work well for structures with efficient right-to-left sequencing and an operator that is lazy in its left argument. In the case of lists, foldl, when applied to a binary operator, a starting value (typically the left-identity of the operator), and a list, reduces the list using the binary operator, from left to right:

    foldl f z [x1, x2, ..., xn] == (...((z `f` x1) `f` x2) `f`...) `f` xn
    
    Note that to produce the outermost application of the operator the entire input list must be traversed. Like all left-associative folds, foldl will diverge if given an infinite list. If you want an efficient strict left-fold, you probably want to use foldl' instead of foldl. The reason for this is that the latter does not force the inner results (e.g. z `f` x1 in the above example) before applying them to the operator (e.g. to (`f` x2)). This results in a thunk chain O(n) elements long, which then must be evaluated from the outside-in. For a general Foldable structure this should be semantically identical to:
    foldl f z = foldl f z . toList
    

    Examples

    The first example is a strict fold, which in practice is best performed with foldl'.
    >>> foldl (+) 42 [1,2,3,4]
    52
    
    Though the result below is lazy, the input is reversed before prepending it to the initial accumulator, so corecursion begins only after traversing the entire input string.
    >>> foldl (\acc c -> c : acc) "abcd" "efgh"
    "hgfeabcd"
    
    A left fold of a structure that is infinite on the right cannot terminate, even when for any finite input the fold just returns the initial accumulator:
    >>> foldl (\a _ -> a) 0 $ repeat 1
    * Hangs forever *
    
    WARNING: When it comes to lists, you always want to use either foldl' or foldr instead.

  6. foldl :: Foldable t => (b -> a -> b) -> b -> t a -> b

    distribution-opensuse OpenSuse.Prelude

    Left-associative fold of a structure, lazy in the accumulator. This is rarely what you want, but can work well for structures with efficient right-to-left sequencing and an operator that is lazy in its left argument. In the case of lists, foldl, when applied to a binary operator, a starting value (typically the left-identity of the operator), and a list, reduces the list using the binary operator, from left to right:

    foldl f z [x1, x2, ..., xn] == (...((z `f` x1) `f` x2) `f`...) `f` xn
    
    Note that to produce the outermost application of the operator the entire input list must be traversed. Like all left-associative folds, foldl will diverge if given an infinite list. If you want an efficient strict left-fold, you probably want to use foldl' instead of foldl. The reason for this is that the latter does not force the inner results (e.g. z `f` x1 in the above example) before applying them to the operator (e.g. to (`f` x2)). This results in a thunk chain O(n) elements long, which then must be evaluated from the outside-in. For a general Foldable structure this should be semantically identical to:
    foldl f z = foldl f z . toList
    

    Examples

    The first example is a strict fold, which in practice is best performed with foldl'.
    >>> foldl (+) 42 [1,2,3,4]
    52
    
    Though the result below is lazy, the input is reversed before prepending it to the initial accumulator, so corecursion begins only after traversing the entire input string.
    >>> foldl (\acc c -> c : acc) "abcd" "efgh"
    "hgfeabcd"
    
    A left fold of a structure that is infinite on the right cannot terminate, even when for any finite input the fold just returns the initial accumulator:
    >>> foldl (\a _ -> a) 0 $ repeat 1
    * Hangs forever *
    
    WARNING: When it comes to lists, you always want to use either foldl' or foldr instead.

  7. foldl :: (HVector v, ArityC c (Elems v)) => Proxy c -> (forall a . c a => b -> a -> b) -> b -> v -> b

    fixed-vector-hetero Data.Vector.HFixed

    Left fold over heterogeneous vector

  8. foldl :: Unbox a => (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Histogram bin a -> b

    histogram-fill Data.Histogram

    No documentation available.

  9. foldl :: forall (v :: Type -> Type) a b bin . Vector v a => (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Histogram v bin a -> b

    histogram-fill Data.Histogram.Generic

    Strict fold over bin content in index order. Underflows and overflows are ignored.

  10. foldl :: Monad m => (b -> a -> b) -> b -> Stream m a -> m b

    leveldb-haskell Data.Stream.Monadic

    No documentation available.

Page 17 of many | Previous | Next